A Comparative Verification of Raw and Bias-Corrected ECMWF Seasonal Ensemble Precipitation Reforecasts in Java (Indonesia)

Dynamical seasonal forecasts are afflicted with biases, including seasonal ensemble precipitation forecasts from the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system 5 (SEAS5). In this study, biases have been corrected using empirical quantile mapping (EQM) bias correction (BC). We bias correct SEAS5 24-h rainfall accumulations at seven monthly lead times over the period 1981–2010 in Java, Indonesia. For the observations, we have used a new high-resolution (0.25°) land-only gridded rainfall dataset [Southeast Asia observations (SA-OBS)]. A comparative verification of both raw and bias-corrected reforecasts is performed using several verification metrics. In this verification, the daily rainfall data were aggregated to monthly accumulated rainfall. We focus on July, August, and September because these are agriculturally important months; if the rainfall accumulation exceeds 100 mm, farmers may decide to grow a third rice crop. For these months, the first 2-month lead times show improved and mostly positive continuous ranked probability skill scores after BC. According to the Brier skill score (BSS), the BC reforecasts improve upon the raw reforecasts for the lower precipitation thresholds at the 1-month lead time. Reliability diagrams show that the BC reforecasts have good reliability for events exceeding the agriculturally relevant 100-mm threshold. A cost/loss analysis, comparing the potential economic value of the raw and BC reforecasts for this same threshold, shows that the value of the BC reforecasts is larger than that of the raw ones, and that the BC reforecasts have value for a wider range of users at 1- to 7-month lead times.